He denies it:
To all those that thought that I'm the GO Train "hacker"...I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but I'm not.
I ride the GO Train everyday to go to school and saw the LED sign. Like many others that day, I thought it was quite funny. If only I could be this ingenious!
He does applaud the hacker, and "loves" getting the credit. But when it comes to responsibility, and the potential punishments that go with that responsibility, then he insists everyone should be looking elsewhere.
Fine.
But then why did he clean up his blog?
Why did he remove the posting that stated that the "snowball" had been started, and this amounted to a "revolution"?
Why did he remove the postings in which he reproduced the various newspaper articles reporting on the incident, more evidence of the "snowball"?
Am I alone in thinking his denial would have sounded better had he not acted in a guilty manner?
And what of "dani elle"? This is the girl who posted "You ingenious hacker; you electronic vandal, you..." -- does Joshua have a message to her to set her straight on this? Why would she think Joshua was the hacker? Does she have some reason to think so?
But Joshua denies it, and the signs will be password protected, so chances are whoever committed this mischief won't be able to do it again in the future. As for Joshua, thanks for setting the record straight. You aren't clever enough to pull this off. "dani elle" was wrong. GO Transit security will keep an eye out for someone ingenious.